@Kaile With Bitcoin being so volatile and the regulations in the U.S. still feeling like a work in progress, I’m wondering if our government should actually be testing the waters with it. Is having a national reserve really beneficial, or does it pose too much risk for taxpayers given its unpredictability?

Could it be that while Bitcoin provides some protection against currency fluctuations, its high volatility and potential funding risks might lead governments to favor a more conventional, stable reserve asset? Shouldn't they wait until there's clear evidence of a strong, internationally accepted monitoring system and appropriate restrictions that can assure national financial stability?

Isn’t it interesting that the U.S. government established a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve under Trump? However, could Bitcoin's volatility jeopardize the financial stability this reserve is meant to ensure, especially when used to combat inflation and diversify investments?